principle microeconomic

this info its going includes this three week we did but we to add this on the last one

1. The paper is done in weekly sprints as it is shown below:
   

   Sprint	Activities	Activity Due Date	Peer Review Due Date
   Sprint Week 1	Write an introduction and provide peer review	Saturday week 1	Monday week 2
   Sprint Week 2	Identify two peer articles and empirical evidence that support the argument/analysis section	Saturday week 2
   Sprint Week 3	Write the entire paper draft and provide peer review	Saturday week 3	Sunday week 3
   Sprint Week 4	Write the final paper	Saturday week 4

   This week you must submit the revised and final version of your paper.Step 1: Make sure you consider all comments you received in weeks 1 and 3 from your peers.Step 2: Do not forget you must follow the precise APA style requested for this paper and specified in the Syllabus section of this course shell.Step 3: Make sure there is a strong connection between the introduction and conclusionStep 4: Submit your final paper as an attachment (word or pdf) by Saturday (midnight). I will grade this assignment by Tuesday or Wednesday of the following week.Step 5: Submit your peer-evaluation and self-evaluation along with your paper. No need for an additional attachment, write your evaluation in the text window (name, number from 0-to-10, one sentence of justification). Read the rubric below to get familiar with the 0-to-10 numbers.The grading rubric is the following:

   The Paper (85%)	The Feedback Quality (15%)
   Paper (85 %)The paper will be graded based on Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling (8 %) APA Style for titles, paragraphs and references (8 %) Clarity of objective, introduction, conclusion and strong connection between the introduction and conclusion (10 %) Economic analysis using economic principles in the argument section (35 %) Empirical evidence that supports economic analysis in the argument section (15 %) Overall quality of conclusion (9 %)	Self Evaluation (5 %)Give yourself 8 – 10 if you provided feedback in weeks 1 and 3, and the quality of your feedback to the introduction and entire draft of other students were very useful 5 – 7 if you provided feedback in weeks 1 and 3, and the quality of your feedback to the introduction and entire draft of other students were ok 1 – 4 if you provided feedback in one week of two, or the quality of your feedback to both the introduction and entire draft of other students were poor 0 if you failed to provide feedback at all
   	Peer Evaluation (10 %) (average of points you received in weeks 1 and 3)Evaluate each feedback your received in weeks 1 and 3. Give each one: 8 – 10 if the quality of the feedback you received from this person was very useful 5 – 7 if the quality of the feedback you received from this person was ok 1 – 4 if the quality of the feedback received from this person was poor

#Essaywriting #Academicwriting #Assignmenthelp #Nursingassignment #Nursinghomework #Psychologyassignment #Physicsassignment #Philosophyassignment #Religionassignment #History #Writing #writingtips #Students #universityassignment #onlinewriting #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #assignmentcollection #excelsiorwriters #writinghub #study #exclusivewritings #myassignmentgeek #expertwriters #art #transcription #grammer #college #highschool #StudentsHelpingStudents #studentshirt #StudentShoe #StudentShoes #studentshoponline #studentshopping #studentshouse #StudentShoutout #studentshowcase2017 #StudentsHub #studentsieuczy #StudentsIn #studentsinberlin #studentsinbusiness #StudentsInDubai #studentsininternational #accountingassignmenthelp #accountingassignment #assignmenthelp #buyaccountingassignment #accountingassignmentwriter #domyassignment #assignmentguide #expertwriters