2 seperate assessments that tie in together elements of the joint committee on testing practices 2004 code of fair testing practices in educatio

/by

Assessment 1

Compare and contrast three standardized tests related to your specialization based on Elements 1–4 of the Joint Committee on Testing Practices’ 2004 Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education (referred to hereafter as the Code). Record findings, references, and a robust rationale on a worksheet. Select one test for further analysis in Assessments 2–4.

This assessment requires you to focus on what will likely be a common task in your future career, regardless of the area of specialization you are studying at Capella: the review and selection of an appropriate, quality, standardized test. There are a multitude of published tests in the fields of education and psychology; many purport to measure the same constructs, content, or skills. Is there a checklist or procedure to help a professional make the best choice among those tests for a specific purpose? The answer is yes: It is the Code.

Although the Code addresses the roles of test developers and test users separately, you will be following the standards for test users and, specifically, the section on selecting tests (refer to page 5 of the Code, which is linked in the Required Resources). There are nine elements to consider when selecting a test. For this assessment, you will focus on the first four of these elements. You may choose to identify more than one category of interest, if it applies to your academic and professional goals.

Assessment 2

Complete a template depicting the correlations of reliability and validity of one test against Element 5 of the Code, and write a 3–4-page executive summary, supported by peer-reviewed academic references.For this assessment, you will conduct a deeper analysis of the technical quality of the selected test against Element 5 of the Code, which states that the test user will “evaluate evidence of the technical quality of the test provided by the test developer and any independent reviews.”

Instructions

Assume the role in the following scenario.

Scenario

The setting in which you work has just experienced severe budget cuts, and the director intends to reduce the number of available tests from three to one. However, you are not convinced that the selected test is reliable or valid. After you raised your concerns in a meeting, your supervisor asked you to evaluate the technical quality of the test being recommended by the director and prepare a document that analyzes its psychometric properties of reliability and validity. Coincidentally, your selected test is the same one that the director is recommending for the setting.

This assessment requires the completion of a template, which includes an executive summary that synthesizes the psychometric properties of the test and provides a final conclusion about its use at that setting.

  • Use the Assessment 2 Template: Evaluation of Technical Quality provided in the Required Resources to record your analysis of reliability and validity.
  • Use the test you selected for Assessment 1 to complete this assessment.
Executive Summary

Executive summaries are real-world deliverables used across disciplines, government, and corporations, designed to convey essential information at a glance. It states the problem or topic and summarizes the results, conclusions, or recommendations. There are many examples of executive summaries on the Internet adapted for many purposes and audiences.

Your executive summary should have three parts.

Part 1: Purpose

Use Section 1 on the template to complete this section.

  • Identify the test and briefly describe the publisher’s stated purpose for its use.
    • Identify briefly a population or psychological condition that is within the standardization of the test.
Part 2: Technical Review

Use Sections 2 and 3 on the template to complete this part of the executive summary.

  • Analyze the technical review conducted for the selected test’s reliability.
  • Analyze the technical review conducted for the selected test’s validity.

For this, conduct a technical review of the psychometrics of the selected test from peer-reviewed journal articles.

  • Three of the articles must focus on reliability and three on validity.
  • Each article must be directly related to your chosen test and one aspect of its technical quality.
Part 3: Synthesis and Conclusion

Use Sections 4 and 5 to complete the following:

  • Evaluate the current state of the test’s technical quality and its status as an appropriate quality tool in the field.
  • Support conclusions about a test’s appropriateness for use in the field and with the population to be served with peer-reviewed research.
    • Synthesize the information from all the articles you reviewed about validity.
    • Evaluate if your test continues to be deemed as appropriate for your planned use in the field and with the population to be served, as suggested by the director in your setting.
    • Provide your references that you used for the technical review and summary to your director.
#Essaywriting #Academicwriting #Assignmenthelp #Nursingassignment #Nursinghomework #Psychologyassignment #Physicsassignment #Philosophyassignment #Religionassignment #History #Writing #writingtips #Students #universityassignment #onlinewriting #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #assignmentcollection #excelsiorwriters #writinghub #study #exclusivewritings #myassignmentgeek #expertwriters #art #transcription #grammer #college #highschool #StudentsHelpingStudents #studentshirt #StudentShoe #StudentShoes #studentshoponline #studentshopping #studentshouse #StudentShoutout #studentshowcase2017 #StudentsHub #studentsieuczy #StudentsIn #studentsinberlin #studentsinbusiness #StudentsInDubai #studentsininternational #accountingassignmenthelp #accountingassignment #assignmenthelp #buyaccountingassignment #accountingassignmentwriter #domyassignment #assignmentguide #expertwriters